Difference between revisions of "Non-Academic Failure Review"
From EDgearWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* '''Attendance Violations (*)''': Grades with an asterisk '''*''' show failures due to attendance denial of credit. | * '''Attendance Violations (*)''': Grades with an asterisk '''*''' show failures due to attendance denial of credit. | ||
*: ''Example'': "'''93*f'''" would show that the student had a 93 average, but a failing grade was given due to attendance, hence the "f" after the 93. | *: ''Example'': "'''93*f'''" would show that the student had a 93 average, but a failing grade was given due to attendance, hence the "f" after the 93. | ||
| − | * '''District Violations (@)''': Seldom, if ever used in current grading systems. | + | * '''District Violations (@)''': Seldom, if ever, used in current grading systems. Can be ignored. |
=== How-to === | === How-to === | ||
Revision as of 05:10, 11 April 2014
The purpose of this report is to provide a list of students who have grades with marks that identify failure due to either Pupil Progression or Attendance violations.
- District Violations (#): Grades with a pound sign # show failures due to pupil progression.
- Example: "93#f" would show that the student had a 93 average, but a failing grade was given due to a pupil progression setting, such as not enough points in the second half of the year.
- Attendance Violations (*): Grades with an asterisk * show failures due to attendance denial of credit.
- Example: "93*f" would show that the student had a 93 average, but a failing grade was given due to attendance, hence the "f" after the 93.
- District Violations (@): Seldom, if ever, used in current grading systems. Can be ignored.
